Legal Opinion
United States v. Bleznak
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 6, 1998No. Docket No. 97-6130PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Chief Judge:
Intervenors — plaintiffs in In re NASDAQ Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation, 94 Civ. 3996(RWS)—appeal from two decisions by Judge Sweet. The first approved a consent decree between the United States and appel-lees. On appeal, appellants challenge a provision of the consent decree that largely prohibits certain audio tapes from being subject to discovery or admitted at trial. Judge Sweet’s other decision held that a Settlement Memorandum prepared by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (“government” or “DOJ”) was not a “determinative” document subject to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re LTV Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- Olympic Refining Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education School District No. 205, and Rockford Education Association, Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc., Proposed Intervenor v. United States of America, American Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Perkins v. City of Chicago HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- McCoo v. Denny's Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Diversified Group, Inc. v. DaugerdasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Lek Sec. Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- United States v. Keyspan Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.