Legal Opinion
I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan a v. Industrial Gear Manufacturing Company
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 13, 1983No. 82-2486PublishedCited by 250 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAMM, Circuit Judge:
Appellee, I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan A (Pension Fund or Fund), sought relief in the district court to secure payments owed by appellant, Industrial Gear Manufacturing Co. (Industrial Gear) for the period January 1977 to January 1981. The single issue presented for review is whether a January 1978 consent decree from a suit between the same parties bars a portion of the Fund’s claim under the doctrine of res judicata. We agree with United States District Judge Charles R. Richey that res judicata does not bar any portion of the Fund’s claim. Accordingly, we…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by250 opinions
- Apotex, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Andrew Whelan v. Tyler AbellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- NextWave Personal Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Athlone Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
245 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.