Legal Opinion

Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc., Proposed Intervenor v. United States of America, American Bar Association

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 15, 1997No. 96-5247PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:

On June 27, 1995 the Department of Justice filed a complaint in district court here against the American Bar Association, alleging that through its control of law school accreditation the ABA had violated § 1 of the Sherman Act by, among other things, fixing law school faculty salaries. Simultaneously, the Department filed a proposed consent decree prohibiting certain conduct and ordering structural changes in the ABA Section on Legal Education. Following the procedure for the entry of consent judgments prescribed by the Tunney Act, 15 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Smuck v. HobsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 283 v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  2. Fund for Animals, Inc. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  3. Massachusetts v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  4. Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Acree, Clifford v. Repub IraqCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API