Woods v. Warren

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

The sole question presented in this Workmen’s Compensation action is the correctness of the action of the trial judge in denying benefits pursuant to his finding that appellant was not injured while acting within the course and scope of her employment.

Claimant was employed as a maid in the Warren House Apartments where she also resided. * Her normal modus operandi was that she would walk from her apartment to the manager’s office or apartment, “clock-in’’, and pick up a master key, her cleaning supplies, and a list of apartments to be cleaned. Her apartment was at the…