Smith v. Royal Globe Ins. Co., Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY, Justice.
This workmen’s compensation appeal presents the single issue of the entitlement of an injured construction worker to recover on the basis of injuries sustained while en route to his home in Knoxville from a construction site in Big Stone Gap, Virginia, some 115 miles away. The Chancellor denied the claim. We affirm.
The basic facts were stipulated and are as follows:
1. On December 8, 1974, and for some months prior thereto, the plaintiff was employed by the defendant and both were bound under the Workmen’s Compensation laws of the State of Tennessee.
2. That the business…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Central Surety & Insurance v. Mrs. Cora Trawick CourtTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. WarrenTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Knox v. BatsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Little v. Johnson City Foundry & MacHine Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Carter v. HodgesTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Phillips v. A&H Const. Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- Pool v. Metric Constructors, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- McCann v. HatchettTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- McCurry v. Container Corp. of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Howard v. Cornerstone Medical Associates, P.C.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.