Legal Opinion

Little v. Johnson City Foundry & MacHine Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1928PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

This is a suit to recover compensation under chapter 123 of the Acts of 1919. There was a judgment in favor of the employee below with which both parties were dissatisfied — the employee insisting that he was not allowed sufficient compensation under the statute and the employer insisting that no compensation was allowable. Both . parties have appealed in error to this court and the employer’s insurer has filed the record for writ of error.

The employee was a moulder working at the foundry of his employer in Johnson City. This plant was located on the corner of Tennessee Street and Walnut…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. De Constantin v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Johnson Coffee Co. v. McDonaldTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Rourke's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. McClain v. Kingsport Improvement Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Moore v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lollar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Wachovia Bank of North Carolina, N.A. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. Smith v. Camel Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  4. McKinney v. Hardwick Clothes, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Mallette v. Mercury Outboard Supply CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1959

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API