Little v. Johnson City Foundry & MacHine Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green
This is a suit to recover compensation under chapter 123 of the Acts of 1919. There was a judgment in favor of the employee below with which both parties were dissatisfied — the employee insisting that he was not allowed sufficient compensation under the statute and the employer insisting that no compensation was allowable. Both . parties have appealed in error to this court and the employer’s insurer has filed the record for writ of error.
The employee was a moulder working at the foundry of his employer in Johnson City. This plant was located on the corner of Tennessee Street and Walnut…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- De Constantin v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Johnson Coffee Co. v. McDonaldTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- Rourke's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- McClain v. Kingsport Improvement Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Moore v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lollar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- Wachovia Bank of North Carolina, N.A. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Smith v. Camel Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1951
- McKinney v. Hardwick Clothes, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Mallette v. Mercury Outboard Supply CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.