Frazier v. Normak International
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Justice.
This is a workmen’s compensation case. The employee, Adele Frazier, appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of her employer, Normak International, and its insurer, Chubb/Pacific Indemnity Group. The trial court held that the injuries arose in the course of employment but did not arise out of the employment and that the employee was not subjected to any definite special hazard on the route to work. The questions to be answered on appeal are: (1) whether the injuries arose out of the employment and (2) whether Mrs. Frazier was subjected to any definite special hazard. We answer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Little v. Johnson City Foundry & MacHine Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Bennett v. Vanderbilt UniversityTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
- Smith v. Camel Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1951
- Mallette v. Mercury Outboard Supply CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- Aluminum Co. of America v. BakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lollar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- Holder v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- Lovell v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County Ex Rel. Nashville Electric ServiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
- Kellwood Co. v. GibsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Roberts v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.