Legal Opinion

Pacific Employers Insurance Co. v. Booker

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1977PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*587OPINION

COOPER, Chief Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation action. The appellants, Pacific Employers Insurance and Halo Cleaners, appeal from a decision of the Circuit Court of Davidson County awarding benefits to the appellee, Betty Sue Booker, an employee of Halo, in compensation for injuries that she suffered when she fell in the parking lot adjoining her place of employment. The sole question presented is whether the appellee’s injuries arose out of and in the course of her employment.

The facts of the case are not in dispute, being derived solely from the testimony of the appellee, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Clark & Fay, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Strader v. United Family Life Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Aluminum Co. of America v. BakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Woods v. WarrenTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Potts v. Heil-Quaker CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holder v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. May Department Stores Co. v. HarrymanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. McCormick v. Aabakus Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Montgomery Ward v. CutterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. P.B. Bell & Associates v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API