Legal Opinion

Champagne v. Passons

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1928No. Docket No. 3634PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This is an action by plaintiff for an accounting and division of profits based upon an oral contract relative to the development of a tract of land embracing 52y2 acres. The trial court denied the plaintiff an accounting ; held that the agreement sued upon being in the nature of employment, the defendant T. B. Passons had a right to discharge the plaintiff at pleasure; and awarded judgment to the plaintiff for wages calculated on the basis of five dollars per day.

From this judgment the plaintiff appeals.

(During the course of this opinion the word “defendant” will be used as referring to T. B.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Petrie v. TorrentMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Butler v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Causten v. BarnetteWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Peardon v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. H. B. Claflin Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1901

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. James v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Milton Kauffman, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Epstein v. StahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Harris v. Whittier Building & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API