Petrie v. Torrent
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Bill for an accounting. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This bill is filed for an accounting.
*46The complainant has for many years been engaged in the general lumber business in this State. He resides at Muskegon. The defendant also resides at Muskegon, and is a lumberman.
The bill alleges substantially as follows:
That the firm of Hannah, Lay & Co., a copartnership of Traverse City, this State, prior to September 23, 1885, were the owners of large tracts of pine timber lands, situate in the counties of Grand Traverse and Kalkaska, this State, and of saw-mills situate at Traverse City and on Long Lake, in Grand Traverse county, and of a lumbering…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Seymour v. FreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Carr v. LeavittMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Dillon v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Jackson v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Lind v. WebberNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Logan v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- Franey v. WarnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Miskiewicz v. SmolenskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.