Legal Opinion
Empire Iron Mining Partnership v. Orhanen
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1997No. Docket Nos. 103269-103271, 103301-103313, Calendar Nos. 4-5PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*413Kelly, J.
This appeal is a consolidation of two cases. The Court is asked to determine what statutory requirements a striking worker must satisfy in order to requalify1 for unemployment benefits under the Michigan Employment Security Act. MCL 421.29(8)(b); MSA 17.531(8)(b). In both these cases, the Michigan Employment Security Board of Review found that the sixteen striking employees requalified for unemployment compensation benefits. They had obtained interim jobs for a combined period of two weeks or more at statutorily prescribed wage-rates.
The employers in Orhanen appeal from a decision of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Tryc v Michigan Veterans’ FacilityMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. RussoMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Adrian School District v. Michigan Public School Employees' Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Head v. Phillips Camper Sales & Rental, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.