Legal Opinion
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 7, 2002No. 00-1518PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge EDWARDS.
HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge:
In 1971, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) rendered its seminal decision in Collyer Insulated Wire, 192 N.L.R.B. 837 (1971). Collyer holds that when the parties to certain types of disputes have provided for arbitration in their collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) the Board will not pursue unfair labor practice proceedings until arbitration has run its course. Deferment under Collyer is appropriate only when the CBA-provided arbitration offers an expeditious and fair means for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Allentown MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. Acme Industrial Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Brewers & Maltsters, Local Union No. 6 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Exxon Chemical Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- King Soopers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Norris v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.