Legal Opinion
Exxon Chemical Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 26, 2004No. 03-1343 and 03-1413PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
After Exxon Chemical Company ceased operating its Bayway Chemical Plant in Linden, New Jersey because it formed a joint venture, the union representing certain Bayway employees filed three grievances alleging that Exxon had violated the parties’ collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”). Exxon refused to arbitrate the grievances. The National Labor Relations Board ruled that the company had violated section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act (“the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), (5). Relying on Velan Valve…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Enloe Medical Center v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Pace University v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Brewers & Maltsters, Local Union No. 6 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Children's Hospital & Research Center of Oakland, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Pacific Coast Supply, LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.