Legal Opinion
Independent School District No. 775 v. Holm Bros. Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 29, 2003No. CX-02-1701PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant Independent School District No. 775 challenges the district court’s order staying arbitration, arguing that its demand for arbitration was timely because the limitations period established in the contract it signed with respondent Holm Brothers Plumbing and Heating, Inc., was not triggered when appellant discovered the injury, but rather when appellant knew both the specific cause of the injury and the responsible party.
FACTS
In 1993, appellant retained KKE Architects to develop plans and specifications for a new school building. KKE proposed installation of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Benigni v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FruchtmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Har-Mar, Incorporated v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Arbitration Demand of 200 Levee Drive Associates, Ltd. v. Bor-Son Building Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003