Legal Opinion

Arbitration Demand of 200 Levee Drive Associates, Ltd. v. Bor-Son Building Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1989No. C5-89-6PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

200 Levee Drive Associates, Ltd. appeals from a trial court order staying arbitration due to an untimely demand. We affirm in part and remand.

FACTS

In January 1980, the parties entered into a standard construction contract for the erection of an apartment building. Appellant 200 Levee Drive Associates, Ltd. (Levee) was the developer and respondent Bor-Son Building Corporation (Bor-Son) was the general contractor on the project. The contract required the parties to arbitrate their disputes and incorporated the terms of the American Institute of Architects (AIA) General…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Wittmer v. RuegemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FruchtmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Arbitration Between Ramsey County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 91, Local 8Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Har-Mar, Incorporated v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Capitol Place I Associates L.P. v. George Hyman Construction Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Patton v. YarringtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Western Lake Superior Sanitary District v. Orfei & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Pioneer Water & Sewer District v. Civil Engineering Professionals, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API