Legal Opinion

Medical Bd. of California v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 2003No. A101128PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEMELLO, J.

Does Business and Professions Code section 2354 permit disciplinary action against a physician’s license to practice medicine based solely on the physician’s failure to complete successfully a substance abuse diversion program? We conclude it does not.

When a physician “flunks out” of a diversion program, the Medical Board of California (Board) is authorized by statute to file an accusation charging any acts committed before, during, or after the physician’s agreed-upon participation in the diversion program. It must then prove impairment or unprofessional conduct by clear…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Coso Energy Developers v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. California Fair Plan Ass'n v. GarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Cuevas v. Contra Costa CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API