Legal Opinion
Coso Energy Developers v. County of Inyo
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 13, 2004No. E034051PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
INTRODUCTION
Coso Energy Developers, Coso Finance Partners, and Coso Power Developers (the Coso entities) appeal from a judgment denying their claims for refunds of property taxes paid to the County of Inyo (Inyo). The Coso entities contend that Statutes 1891, chapter 181, section 1, page 262 (1891 Statute) precludes Inyo from taxing a portion of their geothermal energy operations located on land within the China Lake Naval Weapons Center (NWC). We disagree and affirm.
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The essential facts were stipulated to by the parties or are…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. HoytCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- Diva Limousine, Ltd. v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Mitchell v. State Department of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- California Retail Portfolio Fund Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Hopkins Real Estate GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Russell City Energy Co. v. City of Hayward, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.