Legal Opinion

California Fair Plan Ass'n v. Garnes

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 2017No. A143190PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEWART,

2011, Marlene Garnes’s family home in Richmond, California, was seriously damaged by a kitchen fire. She had purchased a fire insurance policy for the property, with a policy limit of $425,000 (the Policy), from California FAIR Plan Association (FAIR), California’s insurer of last resort. The dispute in this case and the issue on appeal is how much coverage Garnes is entitled to under the Policy. She claims she should receive the amount it will cost her to repair the house, less an amount for depreciation, the net amount of which the parties agree would be $320,549. FAIR…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McHugh v. Protective Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Doyle v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Badin v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
  4. California FAIR Plan Assn. v. LaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Doyle v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API