Legal Opinion

Menard v. Gaskell

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 6, 2005No. AC 25621PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

The dispositive issue in this probate appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to impose a constructive trust on the decedent’s estate. The court concluded that the disposition of the estate of the decedent’s late husband, more than ten years before her death, did not give rise to a constructive trust on the decedent’s estate in favor of the plaintiff, George J. Menard, the son of the decedent’s late husband. We conclude that the court properly exercised its discretion and, therefore, affirm the judgment.1

The following evidence presented to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. Wendell Corp. Trustee v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Starzec v. KidaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Gaffey v. GaffeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Sabatasso v. HoganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Heaven v. Timber Hill, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. Jarvis v. LiederConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Cimmino v. Household Realty Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Garrigus v. ViarengoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Stornawaye Properties, Inc. v. O'BrienConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API