Legal Opinion
Cimmino v. Household Realty Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 13, 2007No. AC 27768PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*393 Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The plaintiff, Robert V. Cimmino, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his action against the defendants, Household Realty Corporation (Household) and Karen I. Tucker, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that he lacked standing. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The underlying facts are as follows. The plaintiff, an attorney licensed to practice law in Connecticut, originally owned, with his wife, certain property in Sherman known as 37 Anderson…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Wesley v. Schaller Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Webster Bank v. ZakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- ACMAT Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. StrongConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- McKay v. LongmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Ulster Savings Bank v. 28 Brynwood Lane, Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Rutter v. JanisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Bozelko v. MiliciConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.