Legal Opinion

Sabatasso v. Hogan

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 11, 2005No. AC 24942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The plaintiff, Linda Sabatasso, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after the jury’s verdict in her favor, awarding only nominal damages on her negligence claim against the defendant, *810Gregory Hogan. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly denied her motions: to set aside the verdict, to set aside the verdict as to damages, in arrest of judgment and for additur. The plaintiff argues that the court improperly (1) reviewed her medical reports prior to the opening of evidence, (2) made comments during her opening statement regarding a lack of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Raybeck v. Danbury Orthopedic Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Fahey v. Safeco Insurance of AmericaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. State v. BunkerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Rosenberg v. CastanedaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DurantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. Mercer v. CosleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. St. Germain v. LaBrieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Menard v. GaskellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. BookConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API