Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Power & Water Co. v. Howell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 31, 1949No. 33292PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuttrell, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff, E. L. Howell, against the defendant, Oklahoma Power & Water Company, to recover damages to his truck arising from a collision between the truck and two trucks belonging to defendant. The trial court overruled defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and submitted the case to a jury, which returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

There is no substantial dispute as to the facts. From the evidence it appears that the collision occurred at about 4:30 in .the afternoon of January 25, 1946, on State Highway No. 23, a short distance northeast of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNair v. BergerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Kastler v. TuresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Henry v. S. Liebovitz & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. St. Louis, I. M. S. R. Co. v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Hisaw v. HendrixNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Brodsky v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Sturdevant v. KentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Billy v. Texas, O. & E. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API