Legal Opinion

Ritter v. Perma-Stone Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 1958No. 37798PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, commenced this action to recover from the defendant damages alleged to have accrued from a breach of their franchise agreement. We shall continue to refer to the parties by their trial court designations. Originally, William S. DeNeen, an agent of the defendant, was also named as a •defendant, but he was eliminated from the •case by the court’s favorable action on his ■demurrer prior to trial.

In December, 1953, DeNeen, an agent for defendant, executed a franchise contract with plaintiff. Included in this contract were specific provisions providing for its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Centorp Corp. v. Gulf Production Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Klaus v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. United Tire & Investment Co. v. TroneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Wilson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Ford Motorcar Co. v. RackleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Oklahomans for Life, Inc. v. State Fair of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Sahadi v. Continental Illinois National BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Power Lift, Inc. v. Weatherford Nipple-Up Systems, Inc., Gary D. Millspaugh and John D. Lohmann, Respondents/cross-Appellants, Apache CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. Sahadi v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API