Legal Opinion

Dirickson v. Mings

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 16, 1996No. 83163PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMA WILSON, Chief Justice:

The issue in this case involves whether parking a disabled vehicle on a city street constitutes a mere condition or the proximate cause of a traffic accident that subsequently occurs. Because the facts are not in dispute, the question is whether summary judgment is proper. We find that more than one conclusion could reasonably be drawn from the facts, and therefore summary judgment is improper.

I. SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Shortly before midnight on February 3, 1993, the appellee, Scott Alan Mings, was driving his 1965 Ford pickup to work on Memorial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nehring v. RussellWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Sloan v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Atherton v. DevineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Agee v. GantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Tulsa, Okl. v. Von BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. LoosenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  3. Moran v. City of Del CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Iglehart v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. Mills v. GrotheerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API