Legal Opinion

Stout v. Rutherford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 23, 1959No. 38331PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

The plaintiff in error, Rosalie Stout, appeared as defendant below, and defendant in error, Pearl B. Rutherford, appeared as plaintiff. The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared below.

Plaintiff instituted this action against defendant and Thomas G. Loafman, who is not a party to this appeal, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of defendant’s automobile colliding with an automobile in which plaintiff was a passenger. From judgment in plaintiff’s favor, defendant perfected this appeal which is on the original record.

Defendant contends that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huey v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Wilcox Oil Co. v. BradberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Purity Ice Cream Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Marvin T. Gates, of the Estate of Fae L. Gates, Deceased, and Marvin T. Gates, Individually v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  3. Vaughn Ex Rel. Vaughn v. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  4. Jones v. FarmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Hobson v. CarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API