Maki v. Chong
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant Charles Maki has appealed in proper person from a district court order declaring that real property owned by Maki’s sister, respondent Esther Chong, was not subject to execution because of a properly filed homestead declaration under NRS 115.010. Maki previously obtained a default judgment against Chong on his complaint for breach of contract, fraud, and conversion. The complaint alleged that Chong converted Maki’s settlement check and used the funds to purchase the real property at issue.
Although public policy favors homestead exemptions in all but a few situations, we…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Long v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Webster v. RodrickWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Jackman v. NanceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- American Railway Express Co. v. HouleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Warsco v. Oshkosh Savings & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Coppler & Mannick, P.C. v. WakelandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- In re TarkanianUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2014
- AGUIRRE, JR. v. ELKO CTY. SHERIFF'S OFFICENevada Supreme Court · 2022
- Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.