Coppler & Mannick, P.C. v. Wakeland
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SERNA, Justice.
{1} The Court of Appeals consolidated two related actions, the first involving foreclosure on a judgment lien and the second involving voluntary waste of the foreclosed property. The district court had ruled in the waste proceeding that Defendant Robin G. Wake-land was equitably estopped from asserting her statutory homestead exemption in the foreclosure proceeding. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment in the waste proceeding on the question of liability and damages. The Court also determined that the district court erred in finding equitable estoppel but allowed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Torres v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Havoco of America, Ltd. v. HillSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Butterworth v. CaggianoSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Grygorwicz v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Deyeso v. CavadiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- In re HamiltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Millar v. N.M. Dep't of Workforce SolutionsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Millar v. New Mexico Department of Workforce SolutionsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.