Legal Opinion

Coppler & Mannick, P.C. v. Wakeland

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2005No. 28,913PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SERNA, Justice.

{1} The Court of Appeals consolidated two related actions, the first involving foreclosure on a judgment lien and the second involving voluntary waste of the foreclosed property. The district court had ruled in the waste proceeding that Defendant Robin G. Wake-land was equitably estopped from asserting her statutory homestead exemption in the foreclosure proceeding. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment in the waste proceeding on the question of liability and damages. The Court also determined that the district court erred in finding equitable estoppel but allowed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Torres v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Havoco of America, Ltd. v. HillSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. Butterworth v. CaggianoSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Grygorwicz v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Deyeso v. CavadiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  3. In re HamiltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
  4. Millar v. N.M. Dep't of Workforce SolutionsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Millar v. New Mexico Department of Workforce SolutionsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API