Legal Opinion

Rusheen v. Cohen

California Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2006No. S123203PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

Are actions taken to collect a judgment, such as obtaining a writ of execution and levying on a judgment debtor’s property, protected by the litigation privilege of Civil Code section 47, subdivision (b), as “communication[s]” in the course of a judicial proceeding? In Brown v. Kennard (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 40 [113 Cal.Rptr.2d 891] (Brown), the Court of Appeal held that the privilege protects both the process of applying for the writ of execution and the levy on the judgment debtor’s property, as an act of carrying out the writ. On the other hand, in Drum v. Bleau, Fox &…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API