Legal Opinion

Jackman v. Nance

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1993No. 23526PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent and debtor Fuz Nance, dba Winnemucca Rent-all, conducted an equipment rental business from a 6,380 square foot building. Over several years, Nance constructed a modest residence inside the building while continuously residing in the building. Nance homesteaded the entire building in which he resided and later filed bankruptcy. lone Jackman, the appellant and trustee in bankruptcy for the estate of Fuz Nance, dba Winnemucca Rent-all, objected to Nance’s homestead claim. After a hearing, the bankruptcy court certified the pertinent question regarding the status of Nevada…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. MacUmber v. ShaferWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Matter of Estate of DodgeColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Edward Leasing Corp. v. UhligDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1987
  4. Clark v. ShannonNevada Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Roberts v. GreerNevada Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by24 opinions

  1. Christensen v. PackNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Savage v. PiersonNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re VirissimoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2005
  4. In Re NorrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1996
  5. Maki v. ChongNevada Supreme Court · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API