Legal Opinion
Steen v. Rustad
Montana Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1957No. 9373PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HARRISON:
On November 2, 1950, defendants and plaintiff made and executed a certain agreement entitled “Lease "With Option to Buy — Agreement” describing certain lands owned by the defendants which covered the farming year of 1951. As a part of its terms the agreement provided:
“In consideration of the foregoing premises, tenant agrees to pay the landlord under one of the following plans:
“Plan No. 1. Tenant shall deliver on or before Nov. 1, 1951, one-third of the wheat so raised to the landlord at the nearest accessible grain elevator, such payments to constitute rental for…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Trotter v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Gersick v. ShillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Slade v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Edwards v. TobinOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Turner v. McCormickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Rumph v. Dale Edwards, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
- King v. Dalton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Hetherington v. Ford Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
- Kluver v. PPL Montana, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Crockett v. LowtherWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.