Legal Opinion

Steen v. Rustad

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1957No. 9373PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HARRISON:

On November 2, 1950, defendants and plaintiff made and executed a certain agreement entitled “Lease "With Option to Buy — Agreement” describing certain lands owned by the defendants which covered the farming year of 1951. As a part of its terms the agreement provided:

“In consideration of the foregoing premises, tenant agrees to pay the landlord under one of the following plans:
“Plan No. 1. Tenant shall deliver on or before Nov. 1, 1951, one-third of the wheat so raised to the landlord at the nearest accessible grain elevator, such payments to constitute rental for…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Trotter v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Gersick v. ShillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Slade v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Edwards v. TobinOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Turner v. McCormickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Rumph v. Dale Edwards, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. King v. Dalton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Hetherington v. Ford Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Kluver v. PPL Montana, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Crockett v. LowtherWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API