King v. Dalton Motors, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Dell, Chief Justice.
This is a declaratory judgment action instituted for the purpose of determining the validity of option provisions “to extend this lease” and “to purchase said property”; and to have the option provisions contained in the lease stricken and declared null and void.
On December 22, 1958, Walter Shirley, as lessor, and the defendant, Dalton Motors, Inc., as lessee, entered into a written lease covering certain business property owned by Shirley. The lease, which was for a 5-year term commencing January 1, 1959, contained the following provision:
“Lessor agrees to give tenant a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Steen v. RustadMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Brenner v. DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- R. I. Realty Co. v. TerrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Ablett v. ClausonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Driebe v. Fort Penn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hood v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
- Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Bennett Veneer Factors, Inc. v. BrewerWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Cadence Bank, NA v. The Alpha TrustCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.