Slade v. City of Lexington
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
.Appeal from Fayette Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
*215Opinion op the 1 Court by
Judge Hobson
Affirming.
The city of Lexington is not on a river, and there is no natural water supply near it. With the view to supplying the city with water, the Lexington Hydraulic and Manufacturing Company was incorporated by an act of the Legislature of Kentucky, approved February 27, 1882. The scheme provided for was in substance this: The requisite quantity of land was to be bought, dams-were to be built, and artificial lakes made sufficient to supply the city with water. To do all this and put in the necessary mains, involved a large outlay. To justify the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Coles v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1886
- Schneider v. C. Hildenbrand & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896
3Cited by41 opinions
- Shayeb v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Steen v. RustadMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Edwards v. TobinOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Gathright v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Walker v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.