Mid-States Products Co. v. Commodity Credit Corp.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
WHAM, Chief Judge.
The question now before the court, on defendant’s motion to strike, is whether it is illegal pleading, prohibited by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. for plaintiff, in its reply to defendant’s counterclaim, to plead a counterclaim growing out of the same transaction or occurrence as defendant’s counterclaim.
The complaint is upon various contracts, set forth separately in separate paragraphs, allegedly entered into during the years 1946 and 1947 between plaintiff and defendant covering the sale to defendant by plaintiff of dried whole eggs, and alleges that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Downey v. PalmerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Cornell v. Chase Brass & Copper Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Fort Chartres & Ivy Landing Drainage & Levee Dist. No. 5 v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1945
3Cited by6 opinions
- Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. v. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1970
- Hilderbrand v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- T. L. Smith Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1966
- Rubewa Products Co. v. Watson's Quality Turkey Products, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.