Legal Opinion
United States v. Thompson
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided October 18, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 66-H-103PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM:
INGRAHAM, District Judge.
In this action the United States seeks to reduce to judgment certain federal tax liabilities which have been assessed against the defendants, Bert Thompson and Charlotte A. Thompson. The case is before this court on the motion of the plaintiff for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The criteria to be followed by the court in its consideration of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is set forth in Rule 56(c):
“The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, and admissions on file, together…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Automobile Club of Mich. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- John v. Rowan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- United States of America, Libelant-Appellant v. Eastport Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Mark Whelan v. New Mexico Western Oil and Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Mid-State Products Co. v. Commodity Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Joseph P. Lucia v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Arnold AronsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Horn & Hardart Co. v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Martino v. McDonald's System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
- United States v. Edward PierceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.