Legal Opinion
Cornell v. Chase Brass & Copper Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 18, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
I. Pleadings.
This action was commenced in June, 1941, as a conventional patent infringement suit seeking both an injunction and an accounting. The answer put in issue the validity of the patent and the infringement. By the time the cause was reached for trial the pleadings had lost that convenient simplicity. In an amended answer defendant added appropriate allegations under the Declaratory Judgment Act of 1934, 28 U.S.C.A. § 400, and a prayer that the patent in suit be adjudged invalid and not infringed. The amended answer further alleged that three groundless suits…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cover v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Kokomo Fence MacHine Co. v. KitselmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Boyd v. Janesville Hay Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Gillman v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hilderbrand v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Carib Ocean Shipping, Inc. v. ArmasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Georgia-Pacific Plywood Co. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Mid-States Products Co. v. Commodity Credit Corp.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1949
- Maison De Marchands Industrielle Ltee-Industrial Merchants, Ltd. v. New York Silicate Book Slate Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.