Legal Opinion

Hilderbrand v. Anderson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1954No. 7194PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Justice.

Upon trial of this cause, the jury returned verdicts against plaintiff on his petition, against defendant on his counterclaim, and for plaintiff in the sum of $96.-90 on his “reply claim”. Thereafter, plaintiff’s motion for new trial on his petition and defendant’s motion for new trial on his counterclaim were overruled, defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and judgment for $96.90 on plaintiff’s “reply claim” and to enter judgment thereon in favor of defendant (under Section 510.-380) was sustained without specification of the ground or grounds for such action, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Peitzman v. City of IllmoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  2. Chitty v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Gerber v. Schutte Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  4. Jones v. West Side Buick Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Clifford Banking Co. v. Donovan Commission Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. Wilson v. Motors Insurance CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Williams v. Kansas City Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. Gover v. ClevelandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Kesinger v. BurtrumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API