Legal Opinion

State v. Hon. hegyi/rasmussen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 23, 2016No. 1 CA-SA 16-0075PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORTLEY, Judge:

¶ 1 In this special action we are asked to determine whether the superior court should have granted the State’s motion seeking disclosure of unredacted mental-health evaluations of the Real Party in Interest, Josh Rasmussen, who has raised a “guilty except insane” defense under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-502 (2010). Because this legal issue is of statewide importance, we accept jurisdiction, and grant relief.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Rasmussen and two co-defendants are charged with armed robbery and first-degree murder. Rasmussen hired John A, Moran,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Clark v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HegyiArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State of Arizona v. Hon. hegyi/rasmussenArizona Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API