State v. Hon. hegyi/rasmussen
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORTLEY, Judge:
¶ 1 In this special action we are asked to determine whether the superior court should have granted the State’s motion seeking disclosure of unredacted mental-health evaluations of the Real Party in Interest, Josh Rasmussen, who has raised a “guilty except insane” defense under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-502 (2010). Because this legal issue is of statewide importance, we accept jurisdiction, and grant relief.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Rasmussen and two co-defendants are charged with armed robbery and first-degree murder. Rasmussen hired John A, Moran,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Clark v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HegyiArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- State of Arizona v. Hon. hegyi/rasmussenArizona Supreme Court · 2017