Legal Opinion

State v. Hegyi

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2017No. CR-16-0264-PRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE GOULD,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 We hold that, pursuant to Arizona Rule of Ciiminal Procedure 11.4(b), a defendant who asserts an insanity defense and voluntarily undergoes a mental health exam must disclose a complete copy of the expert’s examination report, including any statements made by the defendant concerning the charges against him. Accordingly, we disapprove the holding in Austin v. Alfred, 163 Ariz. 397, 788 P.2d 130 (App. 1990) to the extent it permits a defendant to redact such statements under Rule 11.4(b).

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Defendant Josh Rasmussen was indicted for armed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Buchanan v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Kansas v. CheeverSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. State v. MauroArizona Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. William MixtonArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  2. R.S./s.E. v. Hon. thompson/teddy VandersArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Petrone Cabanas v. Hon. pineda/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. E.L. v. Hon CarmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  5. State of Arizona v. William MixtonArizona Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API