Legal Opinion

Warner v. Warner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1937No. 15,592PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKime, J.

The complaint for replevin herein was in one paragraph and was answered by a general denial. A jury ultimately returned a verdict in favor of the complainants, the appellees. Judgment was rendered thereon following which the appellant filed a motion for a new trial. This motion was overruled and that action is the error assigned.

The complaint alleged that the appellees were the administrators of the estate of their deceased father; that he was the owner at the time of his death and that they, therefore, as administrators of his estate, were entitled to the possession of three bonds issued by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New Castle Bridge Co. v. DotyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Waterbury v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Barkley v. BarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Thrash v. StarbuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Cunningham v. HoffIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United Farm Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. MichalskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Snyder v. International Harvester Credit Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Tompkins v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Fineberg v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Whittington v. Indianapolis Motor Speedway Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API