Waterbury v. Miller
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Warrgn Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.
The appellants, plaintiffs in the court below, in their complaint, alleged that they were the owners *200of, and entitled to, the immediate possession of two hundred hales of binder twine of which the appellee had, and unlawfully detained, the possession thereof. The appellee answered the complaint by the general denial. The cause was submitted to a jury which at the request of the parties and 'under the direction of the court returned a special verdict upon which judgment was pronounced in favor of appellee.
The errors assigned and discussed by appellants are: (1) the overruling of the motion for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Bowen v. SwanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wysong v. NealisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- McGlone v. HaugerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Indiana Union Traction Co. v. PringIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Miller v. StevensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.