Legal Opinion

New Castle Bridge Co. v. Doty

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1906No. 20,759PublishedCited by 46 opinions

From Morgan Circuit Court; Joseph W. Williams, Judge, pro tern. Action by Arthur W. Doty against the New Castle Bridge Company. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $5,000, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court (see 37 Ind. App. 84) under cl. 1, §1337j Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 565, §10.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Appellee recovered a judgment for personal injuries received through the alleged negligence of appellant. Appellee was employed in appellant’s yards, and on the day of the injury was ordered to go into the shop and assist in shearing a large steel plate, and while so engaged was hurt by the falling of a pile of angle irons upon his leg. The negligence charged is the permitting of the shears to become and remain dull, the improper piling of the angle irons, and in permitting the angle irons, so improperly piled, to be and remain concealed in the shops at the place where the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. M. S. Huey Co. v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. MaddenIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. DiniusIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Balzer v. WaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. City of East Chicago v. GilbertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. HowertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API