Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Hoff

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1889No. 13,657PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

This is an action upon a note alleged to have been executed on the 1st day of July, 1885, by Graham & Cunningham, for the sum of two hundred dollars, payable one year after date, with interest and attorney’s fees. It was alleged in the complaint that said note had been accidentally destroyed by fire. Defendant Graham made default. Defendant Cunningham appeared and filed a demurrer to the complaint, which was overruled. The only objection urged to the complaint is that the allegation in regard to the loss or destruction of the note is not sufficient; that it should have been averred that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Fay v. BurdittIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Welty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Warner v. WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Bare v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Citizens' Bank v. OppermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Nicholich v. ShasovichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API