Legal Opinion

Thrash v. Starbuck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1896No. 17,430PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Jay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

— The appellees, the widow and heirs at law of Robert Starbuck, deceased, sued the appellants, George Thrash and his wife, to annul a deed of conveyance, executed by the said Robert to said George. The complaint was in two paragraphs, the first alleging the weakness of mind of Robert Star-buck, and that said Trash, by false and fraudulent representations, and upon an inadequate consideration, obtained from said Starbuck the conveyance of an undivided interest in fee-simple in a certain tract of land in Jay county, a life-estate in which was held by one Malinda' Finch. The second paragraph…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Scranton v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. MadduxIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Musselman v. CravensIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Fay v. BurdittIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Law v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Studabaker. v. FaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Fitzmaurice v. PuterbaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Folsom v. ButtolphIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Judd v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Barkley v. BarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API