Legal Opinion
United Farm Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Michalski
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 20, 2004No. 45A03-0310-CV-00393PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Following a bench trial, Appellant, United Farm Family Mutual Insurance Company ("United"), appeals from the trial court's adverse judgment in an action for replevin of a boat known as Velocity brought by Riverside Lounge & Marina, Inc. ("Riverside") and Riverside's owner, Harold Michalski. Upon appeal, United presents four issues for our review, one of which we find dispositive: whether the trial court erred in finding for and awarding damages to Michalski and Riverside in their action for replevin.
We reverse and remand.
This litigation centers around who, between the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Exchange Bank of Culver v. TeagueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Kunde v. BiddleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Humphries v. AblesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Snyder v. International Harvester Credit Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Dedelow v. PucalikIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Coleman v. VukovichIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Sperro LLC d/b/a Sperro Towing and Recovery, Fenner & Associates LLC, Brian Fenner, and AMI Asset Management, Inc. and Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Ford Motor Credit Company LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Deere & Co. v. New Holland Rochester, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Dawson v. Fifth Third BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- American Cold Storage v. The City of BoonvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.