Legal Opinion

Anderson v. BD. OF REV. OF INDUS. COM'N

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1987No. 20574PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Plaintiffs (“the employees”) are seventy-five Amalgamated Transit Union (“the union”) members claiming unemployment compensation under the Utah Employment Security Act (“the Act”). Utah Code Ann. §§ 35-4-1 to -26 (1986). They appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission Board of Review affirming the administrative law judge’s holding that they were not entitled to unemployment benefits for the period during which they were on strike against their employer, Greyhound Lines, Inc. (“Greyhound”). The employees claim that they were improperly denied benefits because the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Lee-Norse Co. v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Bunny's Waffle Shop, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Inter-Island Resorts, Ltd. v. AkahaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ponderosa One Ltd. Partnership v. Salt Lake City Suburban Sanitary DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Crescent Chevrolet v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API