Legal Opinion

Ponderosa One Ltd. Partnership v. Salt Lake City Suburban Sanitary District

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1987No. 860448PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Ponderosa One Limited Partnership (Ponderosa) appeals from a summary judgment barring its action as untimely. We reverse and remand for a trial on the merits.

Ponderosa is engaged in the construction business. In December of 1984, it paid to defendant Salt Lake City Suburban Sanitary District (the District), the sewer connection fee on an apartment complex that was then under construction. The District is an improvement district established under Utah Code Ann. § 17-6-1 (1987). In May of 1985, it billed Ponderosa for sewer services in the amount of $2,800 for the period from May 1,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Apodaca v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Loup-Miller Construction Co. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Rupp v. Grantsville CityUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Staker v. Huntington Cleveland Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Tierra Corp. v. City of West JordanUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Board of Education of Jordan Sch. District v. Sandy City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. V-1 Oil Co. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Walker v. Brigham CityUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Highlands at Jordanelle, LLC v. Wasatch CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API