Legal Opinion

Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1960No. Appeals, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117 and 118PublishedCited by 156 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

These are appeals by the claimants from the judgments of the Superior Court denying unemployment compensation to the claimants. The Superior Court determined that the claimants were unemployed because the work stoppage was the result of a strike and not a lockout. Administratively, the Bureau first denied the claimants compensation but the referee and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review determined that the work stoppage was a lockout and allowed compensation to the claimants and their fellow employees.

On appeal to the Superior Court, determinations of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hogan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Kendall Refining Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. P. McGraw Wool Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by156 opinions

  1. Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Lee-Norse Co. v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Odgers v. Com., Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Rev.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Fairview School District v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Hercules, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API