Legal Opinion

Sisler v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1988No. B036480PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

In this original proceeding, defendant William H. Sisler, Jr., doing business as William’s M & T Electric, Inc., is petitioning for a peremptory writ of mandate directing the respondent superior court to vacate its order granting a motion for referral to arbitration, which order was entered on the last day of the five-year time period in which an action must be brought to trial. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 583.310, 583.360.)

The record reveals the order referring the matter to arbitration was made without considering whether plaintiff Joanne Bockian exercised reasonable diligence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Wilson v. Sunshine Meat & Liquor Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Salas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Davenport v. Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howard v. Thrifty Drug & Discount StoresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Porreco v. Red Top RV CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Nanfito v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Jackson v. GarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Howard v. Thrifty Drug & Discount StoresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API