Legal Opinion

Howard v. Thrifty Drug & Discount Stores

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1995No. S035703PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

10 Cal.4th 424 (1995)

895 P.2d 469

41 Cal. Rptr.2d 362

ARKITA L. HOWARD, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

THRIFTY DRUG AND DISCOUNT STORES, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. S035703.

Supreme Court of California.

June 15, 1995.

COUNSEL

Errol J. Gordon for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Lynberg & Watkins, Charles A. Lynberg and Hellar Ann Hancock for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

MOSK, J.

In this case, we revisit our decision in Moran v. Superior Court (1983) 35 Cal.3d 229 [197 Cal. Rptr. 546, 673 P.2d 216] (Moran) to reconsider the relationship between the Judicial Arbitration Act (Code Civ. Proc.,[1] § 1141.10…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. TannerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gaines v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API