Howard v. Thrifty Drug & Discount Stores
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*429Opinion
MOSK, J.
In this case, we revisit our decision in Moran v. Superior Court (1983) 35 Cal.3d 229 [197 Cal.Rptr. 546, 673 P.2d 216] (Moran) to reconsider the relationship between the Judicial Arbitration Act (Code Civ. Proc.,1 § 1141.10 et seq.) and the statute requiring that an action be dismissed if it has not been brought to trial five years after filing the complaint. (§ 583.310.)2 In Moran we construed the meaning of section 1141.20, which requires trial courts to recalendar a case after arbitration “so that the trial shall be given the same place on the active list as it had prior to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Wilson v. Sunshine Meat & Liquor Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Bruns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Jonathan Vo v. Las Virgenes Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Byars v. SCME Mortgage Bankers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.